Federal E-Discovery: Relevancy Redactions: Appropriate In Some Cases, Court Finds

Litigation partners Chris Boehning and Dan Toal’s latest Federal E-Discovery column, “Relevancy Redactions: Appropriate In Some Cases, Court Finds,” appeared in the June 6 issue of the New York Law Journal. The authors discuss a recent decision in New York federal court that finds redaction of irrelevant information in discovery documents may be appropriate in some circumstances. The decision sticks closely to the rights and obligations of parties under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and provides much-needed guidance on a topic that has spawned numerous disagreements and frequent motion practice. Deputy chair and counsel, e-discovery Ross Gotler and e-discovery attorney Lidia Kekis assisted in the preparation of this article.

» read the article